Search for: All records

Nature's variability plays a major role in maintenance of biodiversity. As global change is altering variability, understanding how key food web structures maintain stability in the face of variation becomes critical. Surprisingly, little research has been undertaken to mechanistically understand how key food web structures are expected to operate in a noisy world and what this means for stability. Omnivory, for example, has been historically well studied but largely from a static perspective. Recent empirical evidence suggests that the strength of omnivory varies in response to changing conditions in ways that may be fundamental to stability. In the present article, we extend existing omnivory theory to predict how omnivory responds to variation and to show that dynamic omnivory responses are indeed a potent stabilizing structure in the face of variation. We end by synthesizing empirical examples within this framework, demonstrating the ubiquity of the theoretical mechanisms proposed across ecosystem types, spatial scales, and taxa.

The presence of edible and inedible prey species in a food web can influence the strength that nutrients (bottom‐up) or herbivores (top‐down) have on primary production. In boreal peatlands, wetter more nutrient‐rich conditions associated with ongoing climate change are expanding consumer access to aquatic habitat and promoting sources of primary production (i.e., algae) that are susceptible to trophic regulation. Here, we used an in situ mesocosm experiment to evaluate the consequences of enhanced nutrient availability and food‐web manipulation (herbivore and predator exclusion) on algal assemblage structure in an Alaskan fen. Owing to the potential for herbivores to selectively consume edible algae (small cells) in favor of more resistant forms, we predicted that the proportion of less‐edible algae (large cells) would determine the strength of top‐down or bottom‐up effects. Consistent with these expectations, we observed an increase in algal‐cell size in the presence of herbivores (2‐tiered food web) that was absent in the presence of a trophic cascade (3‐tiered food web), suggesting that predators indirectly prevented morphological changes in the algal assemblage by limiting herbivory. Increases in algal‐cell size with herbivory were driven by a greater proportion of filamentous green algae and nitrogen‐fixing cyanobacteria, whose size and morphological characteristics mechanically minimize consumption. While consumer‐driven shifts in algal assemblage structure were significant, they did not prevent top‐down regulation of biofilm development by herbivores. Our findings show that increasing wet periods in northern peatlands will provide new avenues for trophic regulation of algal production, including directly through consumption and indirectly via a trophic cascade.

Peatlands are the most efficient natural ecosystems for long‐term storage of atmospheric carbon. Our understanding of peatland carbon cycling is based entirely on bottom‐up controls regulated by low nutrient availability. Recent studies have shown that top‐down controls through predator‐prey dynamics can influence ecosystem function, yet this has not been evaluated in peatlands to date. Here, we used a combination of nutrient enrichment and trophic‐level manipulation to test the hypothesis that interactions between nutrient availability (bottom‐up) and predation (top‐down) influence peatland carbon fluxes. Elevated nutrients stimulated bacterial biomass and organic matter decomposition. In the absence of top‐down regulation, carbon dioxide (CO₂) respiration driven by greater decomposition was offset by elevated algal productivity. Herbivores accelerated CO₂emissions by removing algal biomass, while predators indirectly reduced CO₂emissions by muting herbivory in a trophic cascade. This study demonstrates that trophic interactions can mitigate CO₂emissions associated with elevated nutrient levels in northern peatlands.

Nutrient enrichment can simultaneously increase and destabilise plant biomass production, with co‐limitation by multiple nutrients potentially intensifying these effects. Here, we test how factorial additions of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium with essential nutrients (K+) affect the stability (mean/standard deviation) of aboveground biomass in 34 grasslands over 7 years. Destabilisation with fertilisation was prevalent but was driven by single nutrients, not synergistic nutrient interactions. On average, N‐based treatments increased mean biomass production by 21–51% but increased its standard deviation by 40–68% and so consistently reduced stability. Adding P increased interannual variability and reduced stability without altering mean biomass, while K+ had no general effects. Declines in stability were largest in the most nutrient‐limited grasslands, or where nutrients reduced species richness or intensified species synchrony. We show that nutrients can differentially impact the stability of biomass production, with N and P in particular disproportionately increasing its interannual variability.